Legislative Update: ATP and Transit Pass Bills Move Forward, Rest of Transportation Equity Package Stalls

In a previous newsletter, we identified our legislative priorities for the year, including four bills that were part of a Transportation Equity Package. Over the past few weeks, we have been working hard with our partners to support these bills as they move to committee hearings, as well as oppose bills that may inhibit our work. We are excited to report that AB 2796, which would create set-asides for non-infrastructure (10%) and planning (5%) within the ATP, passed unanimously out of the Assembly Transportation Committee on April 11. On the same day, AB 2222, which would create a statewide program providing free or discounted transit passes to K-12 and community college students, also passed unanimously out of the Transportation Committee. Both bills now go on to the Assembly Appropriations Committee.

Other bills did not fare as well. AB 1982, which would have appointed two new members to the California Transportation Commission with an environmental justice background, failed to pass out of the Assembly Transportation Committee. The remaining Transportation Equity Package bill,  AB 2332, which would prioritize disadvantaged communities in state transportation funding programs, was pulled before the hearing. Others including AB 2360, which would allow communities to put videocameras on school bus arms, and AB 1659, which would expand school zones, did not make it to committee.

While many of these bills may be dead for today, these issues are by no means going away. On the contrary, our coalition is growing stronger and more motivated to fight for transportation equity with each minor setback, so that schoolchildren, low-income Californians, and all Californians, can benefit from a safe, healthy, sustainable transportation system.

Stay tuned for more updates as bills that are still alive continue through the session.

ATP Call for Projects Now Open! Applications Due June 15

Applications for the Active Transportation Program Cycle 3 are now being accepted through June 15, 2016. The ATP funds infrastructure, non-infrastructure and planning projects that promote safe walking and bicycling in communities across California, including Safe Routes to School projects.

There will be a webinar this Wednesday, April 27 from 9:30am-11:30am hosted by Caltrans:

WEBINAR LINKhttps://e-meetings.verizonbusiness.com/nc/join.php?i=PW8038002&p=7442024&t=c

PHONE – 800-857-9797 / Participant Code 7442024

The PowerPoint will be posted on Tuesday, April 26th on the Cycle 3 webpage: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/atp/cycle-3.html The webinar will be recorded and also posted on the cycle 3 page for applicants to view as needed.

Missed our webinar on ATP? The slides and recording are now available. Our recent blog post also contains helpful links and information.

The following information was sent out by Caltrans with the Call for Applications:

Applicants are strongly encouraged to read the CTC ATP Guidelines and Sections 22.5 (Eligible Projects) and 22.6 (Ineligible Projects) of the newly released Local Assistance ATP Guidelines prior to completing an application, and to use the application instructions when completing an application.

The ATP Cycle 3 Application has been revised to correct functionality issues, and the Caltrans ATP Guidance has been updated to address Non-Infrastructure guidance.

Applicants – please use the most current version of the application (v1.1 is top left hand corner) and guidance.

For project specific and call for projects questions please contact your District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) or your District ATP Coordinator.

For general program questions contact Teresa McWilliam at teresa.mcwilliam@dot.ca.gov(Districts 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 & 12) or Ted Davini at ted.davini@dot.ca.gov (Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 10).



ATP Cycle 3 Information Session: Slides & Recording Now Available!

2015 ATP Simple Banner

On Wednesday, April 13, the National Partnership and our partners at the California Bicycle Coalition, California Walks, Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition, ClimatePlan and PolicyLink hosted a webinar on ATP Cycle 3. The slides and recording are now available.

The call for ATP applications was released on April 15 and the deadline is June 15, 2016. Visit the Caltrans ATP Cycle 3 Website for the links to the application, guidelines and instructions. 

Have a question? Check out our Q&A page that has been compiled over the past two ATP Cycles.

Fact Sheet: We have a new fact sheet for ATP Cycle 3. Check it out here.

Visit these links to learn more about ATP:

ATP Cycle 3 Info Session Webinar on April 13

2015 ATP Simple BannerWe will be holding a webinar on Wednesday, April 13 from 10:00am to 12:00pm to give an update on ATP Cycle 3 and prepare you for the application process.

Register now!

Join us on Wednesday, April 13 from 10:00am-12:00pm for an information session on Cycle 3 of the Active Transportation Program. The call for applications is expected to be released on April 15 with an application deadline of June 15. Come hear about what’s changed in the guidelines and application, how to prepare the application and lessons learned from past cycles that can prepare you to be successful in this round. This webinar is sponsored by the Safe Routes to School National Partnership with help from our partners at the California Bicycle Coalition, California Walks, Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition, ClimatePlan and PolicyLink. Registration is available here.

This session will be recorded for those who cannot attend. (The recording is here.)

Our draft agenda is as follows:

  • ATP Basics & Timeline 
  • Disadvantaged Communities 
  • The ATP Application Questions
  • Planning projects 
  • Non-Infrastructure/SRTS projects
  • Quick Tips for a Successful Application
  • Project Examples from Previous Cycles
  • Q&A

We have also updated our ATP fact sheet for Cycle 3. Check it out here.

Questions? Please contact Bill Sadler, California Senior Policy Manager, at bill@saferoutespartnership.org.

Visit these links to learn more about ATP:

Will the 2016 ITIP continue to fund more highway projects or align with new sustainable laws to promote multi-modal transportation?

In October, the draft 2016 Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP) was released for public comment. The ITIP funds transportation projects that improve travel for the movement of people and goods across California. As noted in the 2016 ITIP, this is one of the many state funding programs that covers a wide breadth of areas including high-speed rail, intercity passenger rail, bus transit, active transportation, urban rail, and more.

Unfortunately in the past, we’ve seen a vast majority of ITIP funding go towards highway expansion projects that do include robust active transportation components such as complete streets. Without these types of meaningful active transportation improvements, we will not meet our  greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction goals or create livable, sustainable communities where everyone can walk or bicycle to key destinations such as work, school, and home. With limited state funds, it is critical that our state transportation dollars fund projects that promote increased physical activity and help us reach our climate goals.

In November, the Coalition for Active Transportation Leadership (CATL) submitted comment letter on the draft 2016 ITIP, calling for:

  1. Prioritization of projects that reduce GHG, improve public health, and meaningfully benefit disadvantaged communities: For the 2016 ITIP, transportation projects that achieve multiple co-benefits, align with our goals to reduce GHG, and meaningfully benefit disadvantaged communities should be prioritized for spending.
  2. Apply 2016 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) performance indicators and cost-effectiveness criteria to reprogrammed projects in the 2016 ITIP: With limited state funding available, the 2016 ITIP has reprogrammed previous ITIP projects instead of  funding new transportation projects and elected to not use the 2016 STIP performance measures and cost-effectiveness criteria. We believe this is a missed opportunity to reprogram ITIP projects on their ability to move forward our climate goals. For the 2016 ITIP, we recommend using  the 2016 STIP performance measures and cost-effectiveness criteria to elevate the projects with the highest ability to reduce GHG.
  3. The 2016 ITIP should not fund any highway expansion projects: We are concerned that the 2016 ITIP continues to move forward capacity expansion projects despite how they could undermine our ability to meet our state’s climate goals. We recommend the ITIP, in the 2016 reprogramming and going forward, does not fund any highway expansion projects.  
  4. Projects should clearly state the improvements and how they will benefit communities: Projects should explicitly detail project impacts – both positive and negative in terms of environmental health and safety, as well as any benefits provided in terms of mobility, safety, and public health.

We submitted our comments in November and plan to continue our work with Caltrans and the California Transportation Commission (CTC) to further improve the 2016 ITIP. In the coming months, there will be public hearings on the ITIP so stay tuned for more information.

Final guidelines released for Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities Program!

On Monday, December 7th, the Strategic Growth Council released their final guidelines for the Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Program. Since the summer, Safe Routes to School National Partnership worked tirelessly with Sustainable Communities for All (SC4A) and the Coalition for Active Transportation Leadership (CATL) to promote robust improvements and measures for active transportation to ensure the next round of AHSC funding increased walking and bicycling in communities throughout California.

In our comment letter with SC4A, we expressed our concern with the current model, CalEEMOD and the Transit and Connectivity Methods (TAC), due to the fact that it continues to undercount the true impacts from active transportation. We recommended the Air Resources Board (ARB) revise CalEEMod and the TAC to account for the higher GHG impacts of transformative projects such as protected bicycle lanes and other traffic calming measures that result in better connectivity, less people driving, and more people opting into bicycling or walking.

In comment letter with CATL, we recommended a number of improvements – specifically:

  1. A tiered approach to awarding points for projects that incorporated active transportation: We were grateful that the draft guidelines allocated 10 points for projects that incorporated active transportation improvements, but we wanted to see a scoring system that created incentives for more transformative projects. In our letter, we outlined a scoring system based on the level of innovation of the improvement – the projects that include more innovative active transportation improvements were awarded more points.
  2. 10 percent minimum floor for Rural Innovation Project Area (RIPA): We are supportive of the creation of RIPA, we believe this project area will ensure that rural areas receive funds from this program. However we believe 10 percent is not sufficient based on the need and opportunity in rural California. We asked the SGC to change the language from 10 percent target to 10 percent minimum funding floor to better express that 10 percent is only a minimum and not a maximum investment.
  3. Increase points for funds leveraged from the Active Transportation Program and traditional state transportation funding sources: We acknowledge that the draft guidelines already award 5 points for funds leveraged but we believe these guidelines can spur stronger coordination and planning from other state funding sources that reduce vehicles miles traveled and support community-driven projects.

Unfortunately, in our review of the final AHSC guidelines, we did not see significant changes or revisions from the draft guidelines. We will continue to meet with SGC staff to push forward these recommendations for future guidelines, and we will also attend the next SGC council hearing in December to express our recommendations to the council members. We encourage you to attend – see below for meeting details.

Date: Thursday, December 17th
Time: 1pm – 5pm
Location: California Environmental Protection Agency, Sierra Hearing Room. 1001 I Street, Sacramento, CA 94812

Click here for meeting materials. And if you can’t attend in person, click here to access the live webcast on Thursday, December 17th at 1pm.  

On the Road: SGC hosts Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Workshops across the state!

The Strategic Growth Council (SGC) is hosting workshops around the state so people can weigh in on the draft Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities guidelines. We encourage you to attend one of the workshops in your area and provide public comments to ensure the guidelines promote innovative, community-driven active transportation projects! See below for information on the the workshops:

Date: Friday, October 23rd
Time: 9am – 12pm
Location: Elihu M. Harris State Building
1515 Clay Street
Oakland, CA 94612
Click here to register

Date: Monday, October 26
Time: 1pm – 4pm
Location: Hugh Burns State Building, Room 1036
2550 Mariposa Mall
Fresno, CA 93721
Click here to register     

If you want to submit written comments, make sure you send your comments to AHSC@sgc.ca.gov by October 30th. The National Partnership will submit comments with our partners in the Coalition for Active Transportation Leadership (CATL) so stay tuned for our comment letter!

California Transportation Commission approved Cycle 2 Active Transportation Program awards!

CTC_logoThis Wednesday, the National Partnership and other allies attended the California Transportation Commission (CTC) meeting to weigh in on one of the most anticipated agenda items, the staff recommended Cycle 2 Active Transportation Program awards. In our analysis of the awards, we noted several things that we highlighted for the commissioners and staff:

  1. The Active Transportation Program (ATP) continues to be oversubscribed: For each cycle of the ATP, all the applications total to $1 billion dollars in need. Unfortunately, only $360 million dollars has been provided for each cycle. With these limited funds, the program cannot fund all of the good innovative projects that will increase walking and bicycling, improve public health, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. We recommend the CTC and Caltrans work with the Administration to identify and secure additional funds to make this program robust.
  2. Almost half of the recommended projects were Safe Routes to Schools: We were pleased to see that 50 percent (including 15 percent non-infrastructure) of the statewide program’s funding and 55 percent of the small urban and rural program’s funding was recommended for Safe Routes to School projects. We worked hard to outreach and educate cities, counties, school districts, public health departments, and others about this opportunity so we are excited for all the communities who will benefit from these projects.
  3. Disadvantaged communities continue to be prioritized in Cycle 2: 88 percent of funds from the statewide program and 72 percent of funds from the small urban and rural program went to projects that directly benefit disadvantaged communities. We continue to support and advocate for this prioritization because these communities’ infrastructure has suffered from years of neglect and under-investment. We believe that the ATP provides a much-needed opportunity to ensure these communities can safely walk or bicycle to school, work, and other key destinations. And with two cycles completed, we recommend the CTC and Caltrans carefully analyze the awarded projects to ensure they are providing direct and assured benefits to disadvantaged communities.
  4. Planning and non-infrastructure programs did not compete well: Only 6 planning projects were recommended for funding, and only 23 projects included non-infrastructure programs. Planning is necessary for community to identify the need and address the gaps in their pedestrian and bicycling networks. The ATP should promote planning and infrastructure equally to ensure we create complete walking and bicycling networks in all communities. In the same vein, non-infrastructure programs are vital to Safe Routes to School. Community led encouragement and education programs ensure that children – and the greater public – support and use the new infrastructure. The National Partnership plans to partner with the CTC and Caltrans to ensure that Cycle 3 prioritizes planning and non-infrastructure.

After public comment, a couple of the commissioners responded to our comments. Some commissioners addressed the recommendation for additional funding with an ask for the active transportation community to work with other transportation advocates to enlarge the pie versus further slicing the pie to go to many different interests. However, other commissioners echoed the sentiment that we need additional funding for the program and should not fight over crumbs. As we are in the midst of a special session, this was a very timely conversation. A bill that we are sponsoring, ABX1-23, increases the amount of funding in the Active Transportation Program. The National Partnership will follow up with commissioners to discuss this bill and hear other ideas on how we can see more robust funding for the ATP either through the special session or other means.

Soon afterwards, the commissioners adopted the staff recommendations for Cycle 2. The National Partnership is excited to see another cycle of funding awarded for active transportation projects across the state of California and looks forward to working with the CTC, Caltrans, and our partners to ensure this program is robust and continues to increase walking and bicycling.

First conference hearings for Special Session on Transportation only focuses on roads and business interests


In June, the Governor convened an “extraordinary session” to raise revenue for our roads and infrastructure.

We secured a number of wins in two bills, SBX1-1 and ABX1-23, that would put in place the following:  

  • Any road maintenance project funded by the State Highway Operation Protection Program or State Transportation Improvement Project must provide for complete streets improvements where feasible
  • Require comprehensive reporting on new revenue raised in the special session to show how the projects move the state forward on our ambitious climate, health, and equity goals
  • Increase the Active Transportation Program by $125 million
  • Prioritize disadvantaged communities in new funding for road maintenance   

Unfortunately, legislators could not come together in time to make a deal during the regular session. Now, the special session on transportation has moved into conference. Both the Assembly and Senate have selected members to work together in conference to create a deal that promotes bipartisanship and fixes our streets, highways, and bridges. The National Partnership attended both conference hearings in Sacramento and Ontario to encourage legislators to work together to move forward a deal that focuses on fix-it first infrastructure and invests in transit, walking, and bicycling so we can meet our ambitious climate, health, and equity goals. We also signed onto a coalition letter and statement of principles to further outline our recommendations for the conference committee.

Unfortunately, the first conference hearings were dominated by road and business interests who want to see this funding continue our status quo of building, expanding, and repair our highway and roads without considering our call to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Over the next couple of months, the conference committee will continue to meet and craft a deal that can be voted on in January by the entire legislature. We need more voices at the table calling for our legislators to ensure that this new funding does not fulfill status quo but instead helps us move forward on our ambitious state goals to reduce greenhouse gases and create sustainable communities with safe walking and bicycling for all. If you are interested in being a part of this conversation, please sign onto our comment letter and email chanell@saferoutespartnership.org to join our coalition and help educate our legislators on this important opportunity!

Strategic Growth Council Releases Draft Guidelines for Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program!

In preparation for the next round of Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities (AHSC) grants, the Strategic Growth Council (SGC) recently released updated draft guidelines to further improve the program to promote the creation of walkable and bicycle-friendly communities! With other partners in the Coalition for Active Transportation Leadership, the National Partnership provided input to ensure this round of grants funds projects that directly encourage walking and bicycling. Here are some of the changes we’re excited to report:

  • Infrastructure for transportation is now TWO categories. Now, there is sustainable transportation infrastructure which is transportation and transit capital costs which result in people switching from cars to roads. These investments can provide access to transit or further expand the bicycle/pedestrian network in the project area. And, there is transportation related amenities which are capital improvements such as bicycle parking or street trees that provide support for bicyclists and pedestrians. Creating two distinct categories for transportation will allow us to better track investments and support projects that create both infrastructure and amenities for walking and bicycling.
  • Quantifying greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) from active transportation just got better because the guidelines now allocate less points for GHG reductions (30 points now, instead of 55 points, out of 100) and added 10 points for active transportation. Projects can receive a maximum of 10 points for capital improvements or programs that encourage the use of active transportation. This means that sustainable transportation infrastructure is eligible and transportation related amenities are not — which should create a further incentive for projects to investment in meaningful active transportation infrastructure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Parking for bicycles is a requirement for all affordable housing developments – there must be at least one secure overnight bicycle parking spot for every two units! And the updated guidelines limit parking costs as an eligibility for the AHSC grants, with the intent to phase out parking costs completely in the future. Funds will still be available for parking spaces for car share, electric vehicle charging, and zero emission vehicles.

These are just some of the highlights from the updated AHSC guidelines. We encourage you to read the guidelines and weigh in! The National Partnership will also continue to work with our partners and the SGC to ensure that these guidelines encourage robust bicycling and walking. Weigh in by attending the next SGC meeting (details below) or submitting written comments, which are due on Friday October 30th and should be sent to AHSC@sgc.ca.gov.

SGC Meeting

Date: October 15th, 2015

Time: 10am – 1pm

Location: CalEPA Byron Sher Auditorium 1001 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95812

%d bloggers like this: